Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions of Hybrid Learning in English Speaking Classes: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v9i1.3375Keywords:
English-Speaking Skill, Hybrid Learning, Students’ Perceptions, Higher EducationAbstract
This study aims to explore students’ perceptions of online-based hybrid learning in developing English speaking skills in higher education. Employing a qualitative research design, the study was conducted at the Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. The participants consisted of 87 second-semester students enrolled in an Interactive Speaking course, with 20 students purposively selected for in-depth interviews based on their Grade Point Average (GPA). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns. The findings reveal four key themes: motives, interests, experiences, and expectations. In terms of motives, students are driven by the flexibility, convenience, and cost-effectiveness of hybrid learning, which allows them to access materials anytime and manage their learning independently. Regarding interests, students show positive engagement with diverse learning activities, such as video projects, discussions, and multimedia-based tasks, which support their speaking practice. In terms of experiences, students report both benefits (increased technological proficiency and opportunities for self-paced learning) and challenges (unstable internet connections, reduced interaction, and distractions during online sessions). Concerning expectations, students hope for a more interactive learning environment, including meaningful feedback, and effective integration of synchronous and asynchronous learning. In conclusion, online-based hybrid learning offers flexibility and supports independent speaking practice, but its effectiveness depends on balancing interaction, motivation, and technological support. Practically, educators should provide structured, interactive hybrid settings with meaningful speaking tasks and ongoing feedback. Theoretically, this study will be useful for educators to apply online-based hybrid learning in the teaching and learning.
References
Angraeni, L., Rosmiaty, R., Chuzaimah, C., & Nur, S. R. (2024). Enhancing English learning in an Islamic university context: Identifying and addressing key challenges. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(1), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v11i1.65138
Cao, L. T. X. (2025). The effects of technology-assisted tasks on students’ affect and autonomy: A case study in EFL speaking classes in Vietnam. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00361-w
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Culbreth, D., & Martin, F. (2025). Exploring the role of synchrony in asynchronous, synchronous, and quasi-synchronous online learner engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(4), 2081–2111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10504-y
Dwivedi, T., Prajapati, V., Jariwala, C. H., Prajapati, A., & Murthy, G. V. K. (2024). Analyzing the benefits and drawbacks of online learning in higher education. African Journal of Biological Sciences, 6(Si2), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.33472/AFJBS.6.Si2.2024.1115-1125
Goestina, G., & Sugirin, S. (2025). Exploring classroom practice to develop students’ communicative competence. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 12(8), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v12i8.6913
Kholodniak, O. (2026). Digital platforms as a means of developing students’ oral speech culture. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 11(1), 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v11i1.4075
Liu, W. (2025). Teacher–student interaction in online ESL/EFL classrooms: A review of synchronous and asynchronous communication. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2025) (pp. 1277–1287). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-440-2_144
Lokollo, N. C. E., & Mali, Y. C. G. (2024). Speak more, students! Harnessing technology for active students’ engagement in EFL English-speaking classes. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 18(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v18i1.12653
Maleki, A. (2025). Towards a more equitable education: A lens into EFL teachers’ pedagogical barriers in online assessments. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 44(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2438127
Mata, F., Torres-Ruiz, M., Zagal, R., G, J., León, G., & Quintero, R. (2023). How a hybrid education model can support the COVID-19 sanitary emergency based on information and communication technologies. In Active and transformative learning in STEAM disciplines (pp. 177–196). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-618-420231009
Mekheimer, M. (2025). Technological self-efficacy, motivation, and contextual factors in advanced EFL e-learning: A mixed-methods study of strategy use and satisfaction. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04947-0
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muhalim, M. (2023). Envisioning online English teaching in Indonesia: A digital autoethnographic account. The Qualitative Report, 28(3), 700–716. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5117
Musliadi, M., Triyono, S., & Jamilah, J. (2024). Enhancing speaking agility: Unveiling Indonesian lecturers’ hybrid teaching experiences in oral communication skills. Language Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2024-0018
Ngo, T. C. T., & Ha, Y. N. (2022). The integration of English conversation rooms and chatting to enhance English communication skills for EFL students. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(5), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22254
Olivo Camacho, P. M., Palacio Intriago, J. E., & Andrade Torres, M. V. (2024). Innovative technological teaching resources to develop English speaking skills. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(3), 12185–12200. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i3.12052
Qin, Y. (2025). Online vs. face-to-face: A long-term study on the effectiveness and essence of learning. Cogent Education, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2554314
Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. SAGE Publications.
Sosnova, M., Hlianenko, K., Sosnova, V., Tsyna, V., & Tsyna, A. (2025). Enhancing the effectiveness of learning through hybrid education methods. Eduweb, 19(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.02.7
Sukmojati, E., & Rahmat, H. (2024). Conquering communication barriers: The English Quarantine Al Badriyah Program to enhance speaking skills. JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v3i2.11405
Taimur, S., Onuki, M., & Mursaleen, H. (2022). Exploring the transformative potential of design thinking pedagogy in hybrid setting: A case study of field exercise course, Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(4), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09776-3
Thamarasseri, I., & Martin, D. (2024). Transforming education: Navigating the avenues of hybrid learning for engaging and customized teaching-learning experiences. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 19(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.19.3.20306
Wildaniati, Y. (2025). Exploring hybrid learning experiences in higher education: Perspectives from students and faculty. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(9), 369-379.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syauqiyah Awaliyah Alfiani Nur, Nurdin Noni, Chairil Anwar Korompot, Bustang, Sukmawati Yasim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





