PENERAPAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERARGUMENTASI ILMIAH MAHASISWA PADA TOPIK KALOR
Abstract
Abstract: Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) is a learning model that can train scientific argumentation skills. The ADI model is applied to the topic “Heat” in the Matter and Energy course. The aim of this study is to determine the development of pre-service teachers’ scientific argumentation skills after implementing the ADI model. This research is a quasi-experimental with The Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Group Design. Data was collected through essay test of scientific argumentation skills. Findings indicated a significantly higher mean normalized gain of students’ scientific argumentation skills in Experimental Group who were instructed using ADI compared to students in Control Group who received traditional instruction. The mean normalized gain of scientific argumentation skills of students in Experimental Group is 0,69 (medium-level) and in Control Group is 0,38 (medium-level). Based on hypothesis testing, it shows that the increase in scientific argumentation skills of students who have learned using the ADI model is significantly higher than who have learned using guided inquiry model. Thus, it can be concluded that learning using the ADI model can further enchance students' scientific argumentation abilities.
References
Andriani, N., Triananda, L., Supardi, S., Saparini, S., & Patriot, E. A. (2023). Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Menggunakan Model Toulmin pada Materi Hukum Newton di SMP Negeri 57 Palembang. Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya (JIFP), 7(2), 33-39.
Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for.. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 75-85.
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing Students’communication Skills in the Science Classroom through Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1-27.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods In Education. New York : Taylor & Francis e-library
Dwiretno, G., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 337-340.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.
Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa bebasis pola toulmin’s argument pattern (tap) menggunakan model argument driven inquiry dan diskusi pada pembelajaran fisika sma. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(03), 318-324.
McNeill, K. L., González‐Howard, M., Katsh‐Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge of argumentation: Using classroom contexts to assess high‐quality PCK rather than pseudoargumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 261-290.
Muhiddin, S. T. (2015). Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Pencemaran Lingkungan Dengan Argument-Driven Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Dan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa SMP (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
Muslim & Suhandi, A. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia 8 (2012) 174-183
Nasution, E. S. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan berargumentasi ilmiah pada siswa melalui model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry (ADI). Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 3(2), 100-108.
Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement with Scientific Argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067-1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059
Özdem Yilmaz, Y., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Erduran, S. (2017). The pedagogy of argumentation in science education: science teachers’ instructional practices. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1443-1464.
Sari, R. A., Musthafa, B., & Yusuf, F. N. (2021). Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa. 10. jpp, 21, 37134.
Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848-1869.
Siregar, N., & Pakpahan, R. A. (2020). Kemampuan Argumentasi IPA Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI). LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(2), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i2.113
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1-22.
Sundari, P. D., & Sarkity, D. (2021). Keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi suhu dan kalor dalam pembelajaran fisika. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 4(2), 149-161.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, J.P & Sampson, V. (2013a). Argument-Driven Inquiry: Using the Laboratory To Improve Undergraduates’ Science Writing Skills through Meaningful Science Writing, Peer-Review, and Revision. American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 1269−1274
Walker, J.P & Sampson, V. (2013b). Learning and Argue and Arguing to Learn: Argumnet-Driven Inquiry as A Way to Help Undergraduate Chemistry Students Learn How to Construct Arguments and Engage in Argumentation During a Laboratory Course. Journal of Research in Science TeachinG Vol. 50 No.5. PP 561-596 (2013)
Walker, J. P., Van Duzor, A. G., & Lower, M. A. (2019). Facilitating argumentation in the laboratory: The challenges of claim change and justification by theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 435-444.
Copyright (c) 2023 St. Mutia Alfiyanti Muhiddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Karst : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya, adalah Jurnal Akses Terbuka (Open Access Journal). Penulis yang menerbitkan artikelnya dalam jurnal ini setuju dengan ketentuan berikut:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.