The Efficacy of DreamBuilder-Mediated TBLT in Enhancing English Proficiency: An Experimental Study on Women Entrepreneurs

Authors

  • Aqzhariady Khartha Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0629-6041
  • Muthmainnah Bahri A. Bohang Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia
  • Marhamah Marhamah Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia
  • Heri Alfian Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v9i1.3434

Keywords:

Dreambuilder, English proficiency, EFL Indonesia, Task-Based Language Teaching, women entrepreneurs

Abstract

English proficiency has become a critical determinant of business competitiveness for women entrepreneurs in Indonesia, yet existing programs rarely address their professional communication needs. This study investigated the effects of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) through the DreamBuilder platform on the English proficiency of Indonesian women entrepreneurs in the Academy for Women Entrepreneurs (AWE) program, Makassar. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods design involved 40 participants in a TBLT group (n = 20) or Traditional instruction group (n = 20), with pre- and post-test scores, questionnaire, and interview data collected concurrently. The TBLT group demonstrated significantly greater proficiency gains (mean gain: 25.8 vs. 9.8 points; t(38) = 18.43, p < .001, Cohen’s d = 5.27). Participants rated task-profession relevance highly (M = 4.6) and reported increased daily professional English use post-intervention. Thematic analysis identified four facilitating factors such as task-profession alignment, platform flexibility, resource variety, and peer interaction, and four inhibiting factors such as technological barriers, delayed feedback, limited cultural relevance, and self-regulation challenges. Extending TBLT evidence to adult women entrepreneur learners through a purpose-built digital entrepreneurship platform constitutes the study’s primary novelty. Platform developers and policymakers are recommended to prioritize task localization, integrated feedback, and digital infrastructure investment to maximize TBLT effectiveness in comparable emerging economy contexts.

References

Abe, M., & Kogo, C. (2021). Effects of instruction of English learning design focusing on individual learners’ needs. Information and Technology in Education and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.12937/itel.1.1.Trans.p007

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.

Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389

Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27(1), 33–48.

Bygate, M. (2020). Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project. Language Teaching, 53(3), 275–288.

Cao, S., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, T., & Xu, Y. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035803.

Chen, S., & Wang, J. (2019). Effects of task-based language teaching (TBLT) approach and language assessment on students’ competences in intensive reading course. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 119–138.

Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078141

Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2020). Technology-mediated task-based language teaching: A qualitative research synthesis. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 70–86.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 21–36). Oxford University Press.

Díaz, D. G., Parra, J. A., Leyva, N. L., Herrera, E. M., & Zambrano, L. D. (2023). The impact of task-based language teaching on EFL learners’ speaking proficiency and motivation. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 3796–3810.

East, M. (2021). Foundational principles of task-based language teaching. Routledge.

Fang, W.-C., Yeh, H.-C., Luo, B.-R., & Chen, N.-S. (2021). Effects of mobile-supported task-based language teaching on EFL students’ linguistic achievement and conversational interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 71–87.

González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In M. González-Lloret & L. Ortega (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT (pp. 1–22). John Benjamins.

Goodman, B., Kambatyrova, A., Aitzhanova, K., Kerimkulova, S., & Chsherbakov, A. (2022). Institutional supports for language development through English-medium instruction: A factor analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 713–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3090

Hanafi, M. D., Lali, K., Kably, H., & Chakor, A. (2023). The English proficiency and the inevitable resort to digitalization: A direction to follow and adopt to guarantee the success of women entrepreneurs in the world of business and enterprises. Data and Metadata, 2, 42. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202342

Hanifa, R., Yusuf, F. N., Yusra, S. R., & Suherdi, D. (2024). Adapting EFL materials and its influences on Indonesian secondary school students’ language learning. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 69.

Harris, J., & Leeming, P. (2024). Speaking proficiency development in EFL classrooms: Measuring the differential effect of TBLT and PPP teaching approaches. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(2), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0082

Huang, J. (2022). Task-based language teaching and rigorous instruction in beginning English as a second language classrooms. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2022(175–176), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20468

Hunutlu, S. (2023). Self-regulation strategies in online EFL/ESL learning: A systematic review. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 14(2), 136-166. https://doi.org/10.37237/140203

Kayi, E. A. (2024). Transitioning to blended learning during COVID-19: Exploring instructors and adult learners’ experiences in three Ghanaian universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2760–2786.

Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278–292). Stanford University Press.

Liao, C., & Zhang, W. (2024). The role of English as a lingua franca in FDI: Evidence from China. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2175307

Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2024). Task-based language teaching in a local EFL context: Chinese university teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 28(6), 2234–2250. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044247

Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179–192). John Benjamins.

Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs. (2022). Perkembangan data usaha mikro, kecil, menengah (UMKM) dan usaha besar (UB) tahun 2021–2022. Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs of the Republic of Indonesia.

Muradás-Taylor, B. (2023). Undergraduate language programmes in England: A widening participation crisis. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 22(3), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222231156812

Ouanhlee, T. (2023). Effect on non-native English speakers of utilizing English for business. International Business Research, 16(9), 16–35.

Rahmi, W., Azis, H., Nasar, I., & Setiawi, A. P. (2024). Challenges and solutions in the development of educational technology in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture (ICEHHA) (pp. 13–14).

Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Sofi-Karim, M., Bali, A. O., & Rached, K. (2023). Online education via media platforms and applications as an innovative teaching method. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11188-0

Willis, J. (2021). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books Ltd.

Zhang, Z. (2022). Learner engagement and language learning: A narrative inquiry of a successful language learner. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 378–392.

Zhou, Y., & Deocampo, M. F. (2023). A study of Kunming No. 3 Middle School students’ perceptions on task-based language teaching (TBLT) approach in the English classroom. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 6(43), 370–379.

Ziegler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136–163.

Downloads

Published

23-06-2026

How to Cite

Khartha, A., Bohang, M. B. A., Marhamah, M., & Alfian, H. (2026). The Efficacy of DreamBuilder-Mediated TBLT in Enhancing English Proficiency: An Experimental Study on Women Entrepreneurs. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 9(1), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v9i1.3434