Developing Cognitive English Test on Recount Text Material

  • Nana Erna Universitas Sawerigading
Keywords: cognitive test, , analysis of item questions, recount text material

Abstract

This study is development research. The purpose of the study is to develop a cognitive test that is valid and reliable, with a test that has the level of difficulty, differentiator, and effectiveness of distracter on the recount text material for the first semester students of the English Education Department at Sawerigading University of Makassar. The desired product of the study is a valid and reliable cognitive test that has the level of difficulty, differentiator, and effectiveness of distracter. The development process of the product employed formative research. The validity of the data obtained was analyzed systematically and categorized based on the set standard. The reliability was calculated by employing the ITEMAN program; whereas, the level of difficulty, differentiator, and distracter was analyzed by employing ANATES version 4 analysis. The trial was conducted at Sawerigading University of Makassar. The result obtained from the trial was a cognitive test with 23 questions in multiple-choice test out of 25 questions made in the first prototype which was valid and reliable. The test has the level of difficulty in the category of easy by 26%, medium by 52%, and difficult by 22%. The differentiator in all questions which consisted of 23 questions was at the range of 0.40. It has 0.1 categorized as good. The effectiveness of the distracter was 87% or 20 items with well-functioned distracter.

References

Ahmad. (2010). Pengembangan Instrument Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Fisika Berbasis Literasi Di sekolah Rintisan Bertaraf Internasional SMAN 15 Makassar. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Pasca Sarjana UNM.

Anwar, Syafri. (2006). Peningkatan Kinerja Guru dalam Membuat Soal Objektif melalui Umpan Balik. Jurnal Pendidikan don Kebudayaan. No. 059, Tahun Ke-12, Maret 2006. Vol.12. Hal. 238

Arifin, Z. (2011). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Arikunto, S. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Mahaputri, Ni Luh Putu., Nyoman Dantes, I Wayan Sadia. Pengembangan tes prestasi belajar berbasis taksonomi Anderson dan krathwohl pada kompetensi dasar fisika Smk kelas x semester ganjil se-kota singaraja. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (Volum 3 Tahun 2013)

Mansyur, Rasyid, H. & Suratno. (2009). Asesmen Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Matondang, Zulkifly. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED Vol.6 No.1, Juni 2009. Hal 87:97

Nasution, Noehi. (2007). Materi pokok evaluasi pengajaran. Jakarta: Universitas terbuka

Pardiyono. (2007). 12 writing clues for better writing competence. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta

Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahayu, T., Purwoko & Zulkardi. (2008). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dalam Pendidikan Matematika
Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) di SMPN 17 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, (Online), Vol. 2. No. 2.

Ruslan. (2009). Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Berdasarkan Kepuasan Mahasiswa dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Perilaku Pasca Kuliah (Studi di FMIPA Universitas Negeri Makassar). Jakarta: Pustaka Yaspindo.

Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

Sumarna (2009). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Suparji, (2010). Kualitas Butir Soal Buatan Guru-Guru SMA Mata Pelajaran Matematika dan IPA Di Kabupaten SUMENEP. Jurnal Pendidikan Volume 11 no. 1. UNESA. Hal 57

Uno, Hamzah B., Koni, satria. (2012). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Published
2020-12-29
How to Cite
Erna, N. (2020). Developing Cognitive English Test on Recount Text Material. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v0i0.745