Comparing Online Reading Strategy Use in High and Low Achievers: Implications and Applications

Authors

  • Alfi Suci Dirgantari Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Healty Susantiningdyah Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Hilga Clararissa AS Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Ayu Pardede Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v8i2.3012

Keywords:

Online Reading Strategy, OSORS, Digital Literacy, Reading Strategy Awareness

Abstract

This survey-based comparative study examines disparities in perceived online reading strategy utilization among 488 English language learners, categorized into low-achieving (n = 267) and high-achieving (n = 221) cohorts. The findings reveal that while most learners prioritize problem-solving strategies—specifically focused re-reading—significant divergences emerge in their secondary approaches. Low achievers typically rely on translation and reduced reading speeds, whereas high achievers leverage prior knowledge and skimming techniques. Distinct from traditional comparative research, this study identifies these specific strategic gaps as a foundation for evidence-based pedagogy. By explicitly integrating high-leverage strategies into classroom instruction, educators can provide low-attaining learners with the specific cognitive tools necessary to improve reading performance and bridge the achievement gap.

References

Ahmed, R. (2019). Investigating EFL Learners’ Awareness and Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Comprehension Strategies—A Cross Disciplinary Study in Oman. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/38105

Al-khresheh, M. H., & Al Basheer Ben Ali, R. (2023). A Mixed Method Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Used by Saudi EFL Students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 30–47.

Anderson, N. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228600287_Scrolling_clicking_and_reading_English_Online_reading_strategies_in_a_secondforeign_language

El Madani, E. M., Larouz, M., Fagroud, M., Saadallah, Z., & Barebzi, J. (2024). Exploring the interplay of metacognitive awareness and reading proficiency: A study among Moroccan university EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45–58. https://jeltl.org/index.php/jeltl/article/view/1322/pdf

Habók, A., Oo, T. Z., & Magyar, A. (2024). The effect of reading strategy uses on online reading comprehension. Heliyon, 10(2), e24281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24281

Meniado, J. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), p117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the “Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory” (MARSI) and Testing for Factorial Invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246.

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.

Mudra, H. (2018). Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among Pre-Service EFL Teachers in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.72.5

Öztürk, S. Y. (2018). Use of Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies by Student Teachers of English. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1297197

Par, L. (2020). The Relationship between Reading Strategies and Reading Achievement of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a

Putri Salsyabillah.M, Sulastri Manurung, & Adam Adam. (2025). The Correlation between Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Reading Comprehension. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(2 Mei), 1787-1796. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.2253

Rianto, A. (2022a). Assessing Metacognitive Online Reading Strategy Usage among EFL Teachers in Indonesia. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(3), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2803-11

Rianto, A. (2022b). Exploring Correlation Between Metacognitive Online Reading Strategy Use and Online Reading Comprehension of EFL Students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 23(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1096448

Sukkari, F. (2024). The Use of Bilingual Dictionaries in Beginner EFL Writing Classes the Use of Bilingual Dictionaries in Beginner EFL Writing Classes. 10.13140/RG.2.2.33456.88324.

T. Yaghi, E. (2021). The Impact of Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies on Online Reading Disposition of Saudi EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 1, 364–380. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.27

Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2061683. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683

Downloads

Published

27-12-2025

How to Cite

Dirgantari, A. S., Susantiningdyah, H., Clararissa AS, H., & Pardede, A. . (2025). Comparing Online Reading Strategy Use in High and Low Achievers: Implications and Applications. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 8(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v8i2.3012