Exploring Lecturers' Insights on Metacognitive Scaffolding in Writing Instruction

Anugrah Puspita Ayu Muhammad; Kisman Salija; Muhammad Basri; Waode Ade Sarasmita Uke

doi:10.46918/seltics.v7i2.2413

Authors

Anugrah Puspita Ayu Muhammad Universitas Halu Oleo
Kisman Salija Universitas Negeri Makassar
Muhammad Basri Universitas Negeri Makassar
Waode Ade Sarasmita Uke Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v7i2.2413

Keywords:

Lecturer’s Perception, Metacognitive Scaffolding, Teaching Strategy, Writing Course

Abstract

This study investigates lecturers' perceptions of metacognitive scaffolding in writing instruction at Universitas Halu Oleo. Utilizing a qualitative exploratory case study design, data were collected through interviews with three lecturers from the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Thematic analysis revealed that while lecturers acknowledge the benefits of metacognitive scaffolding for developing independent writers, they encounter obstacles such as large class sizes, time constraints, and varied student engagement. The study aimed to provide insights for improving writing instruction practices and policy development. Lecturers discovered that metacognitive scaffolding is essential for helping students develop writing performances and engagement. The study’s findings align with literature emphasizing the importance of metacognitive strategies and structured feedback in writing instruction. The integration of technology and the positive impact of lecturers' personalities further support the effectiveness of metacognitive scaffolding in enhancing students' writing performance and engagement. Lecturers perceive the implementation of metacognitive scaffolding in writing courses as crucial for improving students' writing performance and fostering independent, reflective learning, although they acknowledge challenges such as students' difficulties with coherence and vocabulary and the distractions of technology.

References

Alfaifi, M. J. (2021). A Suggested Model for Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in EFL Writing Classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th Editio). Longman.

Bransford, John D., E., Brown, Ann L., E., & Cocking, Rodney R., E. (2000). How People Learn Brain, Mind, Experience, and School National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2001. Early Childhood Development and Learning: New Knowledge for Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (Expanded E). National Academies Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., Ronning, R. R. (1995). Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (2nd Ed). Prentice Hall, Inc.

Carter, S. (2021). Metacognitive Strategies in Writing Instruction: Enhancing Autonomy and Self-Regulation. Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 50–67.

Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131–142.

Flavell, J. H. (2020). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Kim, J., & Lee, H. (2023). Lecturers’ Perceptions of Metacognitive Scaffolding in Higher Education Writing Courses. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 44(109–120).

Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Riemer, F. J. (2012). Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs. Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Nguyen, T. (2023). Institutional Support and Lecturer Confidence in Implementing Metacognitive Strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 70–80.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (3rd Editio). Sage Publications.

Ramadhanti, D. (2021). Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Its Impact on Writing Skill. 5(3), 193–206.

Riwayatiningsih, R., Rukmini, D., Yuliasri, I., & Pratama, H. (2022). Unpacking Students’ Metacognitive Experience s in Writing Course: The Effects of Strategy Instruction. 1044–1050.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–373.

Thompson, R., & Alvarado, M. (2022). Challenges in Implementing Metacognitive Scaffolding in Large Writing Classes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 80–90.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fifth). SAGE Publications.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2020). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. (Routledge (ed.)).