Habib Rishiq Shihab Hate Speaking on Youtube Social Media: Forensic Linguistic Analysis

  • Alfian Muhajir Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Tadjuddin Maknun Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Kamsinah Kamsinah Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Firman Saleh Universitas Hasanuddin
Keywords: Hate Speech, Social Media, Forensic Linguistics

Abstract

This study aims to explain the forms of speech acts included in Habib Rishiq Shihab's hate speech on YouTube social media. The data from this survey is Habib Rishiq Shihab's talk uploaded to YouTube social media, including hate speech. The data source for this research is a video format document uploaded to YouTube social media related to Habib Rishiq Shihab's speech, including hate speech. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method. See Data acquisition techniques and annotations. Data analysis using data analysis method, namely qualitative content analysis method (qualitative content analysis). The results of this study indicate that: Habib Rishiq Shihab's speech on YouTube is declarative and question-based. The form of intra-speech action uses declarative and directive idioms. A speech act is a form of effect that affects the interlocutor. The statement is seen as a form of provocation/incitement that can create feelings of hatred or hostility towards specific individuals or groups based on ethnicity, religion, race, and inter-group (SARA), which can be carried out and is classified as illegal, so that it can be categorized as having committed an unlawful act as referred to in paragraph, which is regulated in the formulation of Article 45A paragraph (2) of the ITE Law and Article 160 of the Criminal Code.

References

Astri, Z., & Fian, A. (2020). The Sociolinguistics Study On The Use Of Code Mixing In Gita Savitri Devi’s Youtube Channel Video. 3(2), 83–92. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/seltics

Casim, P, D. M. S., Pratomo, & Sundawati, L. (2019). Kajian Linguistik Forensik Ujaran Bau Ikan Asin Oleh Galih Ginanjar Terhadap Fairuz A. Rafiq. Metabahasa, 1(2), 22–28.

Leech. (2011). Principles of Pragmatics. University of Indonesia.

Mawarti. (2017). Hate Speech Phenomenon The Impact of Hate Speech. Journal of Tolerance, 10(1), 221–224.

Noer, F., Astri, Z., & Hairuddin, N. H. (2021). English Language Variation of Tourist Guide: A Case Study of Indonesian Context. 4(2), 133–144. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/seltics

Pages, et al. (2014). Researching Language and social media: A Student Guide. Routledge.

Parera. (2004). Semantic Theory Second Edition (Erlangga).

Puntoadi. (2008). “The Influence of Instagram Social Media on Competitive Advantage: (Case Study on Medium Enterprises Guten Inc Bandung). eProceedings of Management.

Rahardi. (2003). Pragmatics of Indonesian Imperative Politeness. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Saleh, F., & Nasrullah, I. (2019). Sapaan Keakraban Remaja Sebagai Pemicu Konflik Di Makassar: Kajian Pragmatik. Idiomatik: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 24–31.

Sarwiji. (2008). Semantics: Introduction to the Study of Multilingual Meaning: Exploring Various Language Practices. Bandung: Padeogogia.

Sholihatin, E. (2019). Forensic Linguistics and Language Crimes. Student Library.

Subyantoro. (2019). “Forensic Linguistics: Contribution of Language Studies in Law Enforcement”. ADIL Indonesia Journal, 1(1), 36-50.

Sudaryanto. (1990). Methods and Various Language Research Techniques. Yogyakarta. Ambassador of Discourse University Press.

Sugiono. (2011). Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alphabeta.

Triyanto. (2016). Forensic Linguistics Study of Hate Speech on social media. Bogor: STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor.

Wahab, I., Astri, Z., Tanasy, N., & Fachrunnisa, N. (2021). A Conversation Analysis: The Use of Small-Talk. 4(1), 53–62. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/seltics
Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Muhajir, A., Maknun, T., Kamsinah, K., & Saleh, F. (2022). Habib Rishiq Shihab Hate Speaking on Youtube Social Media: Forensic Linguistic Analysis. Seltics Journal: Scope of English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 5(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v5i2.1320