Dicatet Mak!

Praktek Berutang dan Resiprositas di Masyarakat Kebun Sei Muara

  • Endang Purwasari Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: Debt, Debtor, Creditor, Resiprosity, Party, Contribution

Abstract

Debt has been a common phenomenon in people’s lives, both in the big cities, as well as in remote areas. This debt activity has been internalized into people's lives so that it cannot be separated no matter how small. There are quite a number of  existing related literatures that deal with this. However, debt is only seen as a means to meet the daily needs of debtors, in which the relationship between creditors and debtors is not far enough studied. The study related to the relationship between creditors and debtors (if any) is still limited. This article seeks to complement the existing literature by examining debt and credit cyrcle that create new relationships in the spectrum of oil palm plantation employees.

This ethnographic study takes place in the housing complex of oil palm plantation employees in Kebun Sei Muara, Kalimantan Island. It involved 26 female informants consisting of six women workers, six housewives, and fourteen female traders. Data was collected using in-depth interview in order to explor the reasons for debt, reason for giving debt, the implication of debt, and how parties are related to debt. While participatory observation is carried out by participating in the daily activities of the Kebun Sei Muara community, such as shopping at a food stall, attending parties, helping in various parties, gossiping, social gathering, etc.

The study indicates that debt has become the foundation of reciprocity relations in Kebun Sei Muara. This debt is carried out for from daily needs to the need for making life cycle parties, which involve not only the poor, but also rich people. This creates a reciprocal bond between the debtor and the creditor, the host and the guests, as well as creates balanced reciprocity between them. This relationship raises an obligation for both actors involved to give and return the contribution for the attending parties. In this context, there is a norm that requires them to come to provide contribution in the form of money and/or goods to the host, and expecting to have a balanced reciprocity in return. The higher the status, the bigger the party, the more debts the host make, and the return contribution will be used to pay for the debt. The higher the status, the more contribution the guests have to provide, though it depends on the closeness between the host and the guests, as well their previous contribution. Community members, who do not participate in the debt circle, will automatically be ostracized from social activities and are considered as “the others”. Conflict potentially occurs between debtor and creditor when payment is neglected, but this is depended on how the creditor responds to it. It is common, however, that this may be impacted on the future relationship not only between the two, but also with others in the Kebun Sei Muara.

References

Acciaioli, G. 2009. Utang Piutang dan Sistem Kekerabatan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat Bugis Perantauan dan Pemasaran Ikan di Danau Lindu, Sulawesi Tengah dalam Tol, Roger; van Dijk, Kees; Acciaioli, Greg. Kuasa dan Usaha di Masyarakat Sulawesi Selatan. Makassar: Ininnawa bekerjasama dengan KITLV, 279-318.

Asmadi, A. 2013. Indonesia Kini Penghasil Minyak Sawit Terbesar di Dunia. http://pontianak.tribunnews.com/201kini-penghasil-minyak-sawit-terbesar-di-dunia, diakses tanggal 20 Maret 2020.

Dara, U. D. 2018. Hutang Piutang di Kalangan Buruh Perempuan di Desa Jetis, Kecamatan Jetis, Kabupaten Mojokerto. Naskah Publikasi. Surabaya: Departemen Sosiologi Universitas Airlangga.

Graeber, D. 2011. Debt: The First 5.000 Years. New York: Melville House.

Hamid, A. 2017. “Hutang Palêan: Studi terhadap Perilaku Masyarakat Desa Prancak Kecamatan Pasongsongan Kabupaten Sumenep Madura:”, Ekomadania, 1(1):57-85.

Hart, A. G. 1954. Money, Debt, and Economic Activity. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Jumalia. 2019. “Angnginrang: Prilaku Berutang Masyarakat di Pulau Kodingareng”. Emik, Desember, 2(2): 192-211.

Keppler, J. H. 2010. Adam Smith and the Economy of Passion. London: Routledge.

Kutanegara, P. M. 2003. Resiprositas Dalam Masyarakat Pedesaan Jawa: Studi tentang Kegiatan Sumbang Menyumbang di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Ledeneva, Alena; Bailey, Anna; Baron, Sheelagh; Curro, Costanza; Teague, Elizabeth. 2018. Global Encyclopaedia of Informality, Volume 1: Towards Understanding of Social and Cultural Complexity. London: UCL Press.

Lingkungan Alam. 2017. Daerah Perkebunan Penghasil Sawit Terbesar di Indonesia. http://www.lingkunganalam.com/daerah-penghasil-sawit, diakses tanggal 23 Maret 2020.

Malinowski, B. 1932. Crime, and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trech, Trubner & Co.

Meivani, Y., & Arsal, T. 2015. “Sistem Hutang Piutang di Warung Kelontong pada Masyarakat Pedesaan”, Solidarity, 4(2):109-120.

Nugroho, H. 2001. Uang, Rentenir, dan Hutang Piutang di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Polanyi, K. 2003. Transformasi Besar: Asal-usul Politik dan Ekonomi Zaman Sekarang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Purwasari, E. 2012. Budaya Hutang di Kalangan Karyawati Kebun Sei Muara, Kebun Sungai Dekan, Kecamatan Meliau, Kabupaten Sanggau, Kalimantan Barat. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, Inc.

Syatori. 2014. “Ekologi Politik Masyarakat Pesisir: Analisis Sosiologis Kehidupan Sosial-ekonomi dan Keagamaan Masyarakat Nelatan Desa Citemu Cirebon”, Holistik, 15(2):241-264.

Published
2020-06-20
How to Cite
Purwasari, E. (2020). Dicatet Mak!. Emik, 3(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.46918/emik.v3i1.483