Relasi Kuasa, Modal, dan Politik Lokal: Studi Kasus Masyarakat Nelayan di Desa Bababulo, Kabupaten Majene, Sulawesi Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46918/emik.v8i2.2971Keywords:
Punggawa, Sawi, Patronage, Social Capital, Political Mobilization, Local DemocracyAbstract
The patron client bond between punggawa (boat owners) and sawi (crew members) in Bababulo’s coastal community, Majene Regency, demonstrates how contemporary electoral politics have reconfigured longstanding patterns of exchange and moral obligation. This research underscores a significant shift in the basis of punggawa power, which no longer depends solely on economic assets, but increasingly on the capacity to convert social and symbolic resources such as trust, indebtedness, prestige, and protective roles into political capital that can effectively mobilize votes. Employing a qualitative approach, data was collected through in-depth interviews and participant observation with eleven purposively selected participants, including punggawa, sawi, village authorities, and local political figures. Narrative analysis was applied to uncover processes of meaning-making, power negotiation, and mobilization embedded in everyday interactions. The findings show that the authority of a punggawa is continually reinforced through longstanding moral debts and social trust, which later become political commitments during election periods. Punggawa act as intermediaries who link the fishing community to broader political structures, while sawi are not completely passive; they take advantage of electoral moments to negotiate social and economic gains. The study concludes that traditional patronage persists, but in a transformed form becoming more calculated and transactional while still rooted in moral norms and mutual dependence that have adjusted to the dynamics of modern democratic practice.
References
Arifin, A. (2022). Kayanya Laut, Miskinnya Nelayan : Sebuah Paradok di Jagad Maritim. Kota: Unhas Press.
Aspinall, E. (2014). “Parliament and Patronage.” Journal of Democracy, 25(1):96–110,
https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/indonesias-2014-elections-parliament- and-patronage, diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2025.
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). “The Forms of Capital” dalam J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Kota: Greenwood, 241–258.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, diakses tanggal 18 Juli 2025.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (edisi IV.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Haryanto. (2017). “Adaptation and Continuities in Clientelism in a Fishing Community in Takalar, South Sulawesi.” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(3):511–53, https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-3f, diakses tanggal 7 September 2025.
Lucas, A. & Warren, C. (2013). Land for the People: The State and Agrarian Conflict in Indonesia. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Mauss, M. (1925). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Mengge, A. (2019). “Struktur Ketimpangan Sosial Masyarakat Nelayan Tradisional.” Jurnal Masyarakat Pesisir, 4(2):101–115, https://ijhss.thebrpi.org/journals/Vol_9_No_2_February_2019/14 .pdf diakses tanggal 25 Juni 2025.
Miñarro, S., Navarrete Forero, G., Reuter, H., & van Putten, I. E. (2016). The Role of Patron–Client Relations on the Fishing Behaviour of Artisanal Fishermen in the Spermonde Archipelago (Indonesia). Marine Policy, 69:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.006
Nurdin, N. & Grydehøj, A. (2014). Informal governance through patron–client relationships and destructive fishing in the Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 3(2):54–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2014.11.003, diakses tanggal 25 Juni 2025.
Pelras, C. (1996). The Bugis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Roberts, N., Mengge, B., Utina, M. R., Muhatar, F., Anugerah, A., Icwardanhi, A., Zulkifli, R. M., & Humphries, A. (2022). “Patron–client Relationships Shape Value Chains in an Indonesian Island-Based Fisheries System.” Marine Policy, 143,105142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105142, diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2025.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1972). “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” The American Political Science Review, 66(1):91–113, https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280, diakses tanggal 17 Juli 2025.
Thompson, E. P. (1971). “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century. Past & Present.” Exford Academic (1):76–136, https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76, diakses tanggal 25 Juli 2025.
Von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2013). Political and Legal Transformations in an Indonesian Polity: The Nagari from Colonisation to Decentralisation. Cambridge: University Press.
Törnquist, O. (2013). Assessing Dynamics of Democratisation: Transformative Politics, New Institutions, and the Case of Indonesia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zahra Latifah, Gustiana A. Kambo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








9.png)










