ANALISIS TATA KELOLA KELEMBAGAAN DALAM PENGELOLAAN PERHUTANAN SOSIAL DI KABUPATEN TORAJA UTARA

Analysis Of Institutional Governance In Social Forestry Management In North Toraja Regency

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46918/eboni.v7i1.2708

Keywords:

Social Forestry, Community Forest, Governance, Institutionalization

Abstract

Social Forestry (PS) is a forest management program that grants management rights to local communities to access and manage forest areas legally and sustainably. This program not only aims to preserve the forest, but also to improve the welfare of the community, including in the aspect of food security and self-sufficiency.This study aims to evaluate the management of Community Forest (HKm) in North Toraja Regency with a focus on institutional and business aspects. Data collection was conducted through observation, structured interviews, and examination of institutional documents in three Forest Farmer Groups (KTH), namely Tambuntana, Tombang Riri, and Sipaelle. The sampling technique used purposive sampling and quota sampling methods. The results showed that the planning and institutional aspects were in the good category, with average scores of 110 and 109.57 respectively. However, other obligations such as the preparation of annual reports were classified as poor with a score of 39.13, indicating a lack of attention to documentation of activities. Community empowerment scored moderately well (46.09), which was influenced by the suboptimal role of Forest Management Unit extension workers in training and marketing Non-Timber Forest Products. The business governance aspect was also categorized as quite good (87.61), supported by the existence of a group business structure, but constrained by a lack of training and market access. Supporting factors for HKm management include the existence of planning documents, the desire to preserve the forest, and assistance from the government. Meanwhile, inhibiting factors include the lack of member involvement, limited human resources, and not optimal government support in marketing Non-Timber Forest Products. Overall, the performance of community forest management in the three forest farmer groups is in the good category, but needs improvement in the aspects of administrative obligations and community empowerment.

References

1. Awang, San Afri., Wahyu Tri Widayanti., Bariatul Himmah., Ambar Astuti., Ratih Madya Septiana., Solehudin., Antonius Novenanto. 2008. Panduan Pemberdayaan Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH). Montpellier, France: French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), dan Yogyakarta, Indonesia: PKHR Fakultas Kehutanan UGM.

2. BPS, 2015. Nusa Tenggara Barat dalam Data. Bidang Statistik Bappeda Provinsi NTB.

3. Cahyaningsih, Nurka., Gamal Pasya, Warsito. 2006. HKm Lampung Barat: Panduan Cara memproses Perijinan dan Kiat Sukses menghadapi Evaluasi. World Agroforestry Centre Asia Tenggara dan Dinas Kehutanan dan PSDA Lampung Barat.

4. Departemen Kehutanan. 1992. Manual Kehutanan. Departemen Kehutanan. Jakarta.

5. Departemen Kehutanan. 1999. Panduan Pelaksanaan Pembinaan Masyarakat Desa Hutan. Jakarta: Pusat Bina Penyuluhan Kehutanan.

6. Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. (2022). Laporan Tahunan Program Hutan Kemasyarakatan Kabupaten Toraja Utara. Makassar: Dishut Sulsel.

7. Diniyati, Dian. 2015. Satwa Yang Sering ditemukan pada Hutan Rakyat Agroforestry di Kabupaten Ciamis Jawa Barat. Jurnal PROS SEM NAS MASY BIODIV INDON Volume 1, Nomor 3, Juni 2015 ISSN: 2407-8050 Halaman: 642-646

8. Djogo, Tony., Sunaryo., Didik Suharjito., Martua Sirait. 2003. Kelembagaan dan Kebijakan dalam Pengembangan Agroforestri. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Office. Bogor. Indonesia.

9. FAO. (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020 – Main Report. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

10. GAPOKTAN MERTESARI, 2011. Rencana Umum Pengelolaan HKm Senggigi.

11. Hakim I., S. Irawanti, Murniati, Sumarharni, A. Widiarti, R. Effendi, M. Muslich, Sri. Rulliaty. 2010. Social Forestry: Menuju Masyarakat Sejatera. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan.

12. Ichsan, Andi Chairil., Bisrul Khofi, Almuarif Satria Putra, Christian Purba, Citra Hartati, Giorgio Budi Indrarto, Isnenti Apriani. 2014. Laporan Assesment: Tata Kelola Kehutanan Di Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Jaringan Tata Kelola Hutan. Bogor. Abbas, E. W., & Erlyani, N. (2020). Menulis di Kala Badai Covid-19.

13. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK), 2015. Deforestasi Indonesia Tahun 2013-2014. Jakarta: Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Hutan Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan dan Lingkungan Hidup.

14. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK). (2016). Permen LHK No. P.83/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/10/2016 tentang Perhutanan Sosial.

15. Markum, Budhy Setiawan, Rahmat Sabani. 2015. Hutan Kemasyarakatan: Sebuah Ikhtiar Mewujudkan Hutan Lestari Masyarakat Sejahtera. Mataram : RA Visindo.

16. Maryudi, A., & Krott, M. (2012). "Poverty Alleviation Efforts through a Community Forestry Program in Java, Indonesia." Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(2), 43–53.

17. Nandini, Ryke. 2013. Evaluasi Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan (Hkm) Pada Hutan Produksi Dan Hutan Lindung Di Pulau Lombok. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Tanaman Vol. 10 No. 1, Maret 2013: 43-55.

18. Perum Perhutani. 2001. Keputusan Direksi Perum Perhutani Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat. Jakarta: Perum Perhutani.

19. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor: P.83/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/10/2016 Tentang Perhutanan Sosial.

20. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: P.37/Menhut-II/2007 Tentang Hutan Kemasyarakatan

21. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: P.57/Menhut-II/2014 Tentang Pedoman Pembinaan Kelompok Tani Hutan

22. Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor: P.88/Menhut-II/2014 Tentang Hutan Kemasyarakatan

23. Puspita ID. 2006. Motivasi Petani dan Peranan Kelompok Tani Hutan (KTH) dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM) DI Desa Warnasari, BKPH Pangalengan KPH Bandung Selatan [Skripsi] Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.

24. Rahmina, Yanti Sofia, Edy Marbyanto, Ali Mustofa. 2012. Tata Cara dan Prosedur Pengembangan Program Pengelolaan Hutan Berbasis Masyarakat dalam Kerangka Undang-undang No. 41 Tahun 1999. GIZ dan FORCLIME.

25. Sanjaya, Rizki., Christine Wulandari., Susni Herawanti. 2017. Evaluasi Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm) pada Gabungan Kelompok Tani Rukun Lestari Sejahtera di Desa Sindang Pagar Kecamatan Sumberjaya Kabupaten Lampung Barat. Jurnal Sylva Lestari Vol. 5 No.2, April 2017 (30—42)

26. Sari, D.A.P., & Nugroho, A. (2019). Tata Kelola Usaha Hutan Kemasyarakatan dan Dampaknya terhadap Ekonomi Lokal. Jurnal Agroforestri Indonesia, 11(2), 75–84.

27. Siscawati, M., & Mahaningtyas, A. (2017). "Forest Tenure Reform in Indonesia: The Importance of Accountability and Gender Equality." CIFOR Working Paper.

28. Sudarsono, Dwi. 2016. Panduan Monitoring dan Evaluasi PHBM. SAMANTA. Mataram.

29. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung.

30. Suratiyaningrum. 2013. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat (PHBM) LMDH Wana Bumi Tirta Makmur, Desa Banjaranyar, BKPH Margasari, KPH Balapulang, Perum Perhutani Unit I Jawa Tengah. Repository IPB. Skripsi.

31.Wulandari, C., & Inoue, M. (2018). "The Importance of Leadership and Institutions in the Sustainability of Community-Based Forest Management in Indonesia." International Forestry Review, 20(3), 333–345.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-14

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): JUNI

Section

Articles

License

Jurnal Eboni © 2019 by LPPM UMMA is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

How to Cite

ANALISIS TATA KELOLA KELEMBAGAAN DALAM PENGELOLAAN PERHUTANAN SOSIAL DI KABUPATEN TORAJA UTARA: Analysis Of Institutional Governance In Social Forestry Management In North Toraja Regency. (2025). Jurnal Eboni, 7(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.46918/eboni.v7i1.2708