TANTANGAN TEKNOLOGI DAN PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN DALAM PEMETAAN PARTISIPATIF: Studi Kasus PLUP+ di Labbo, Indonesia
Technological and Stakeholder Challenges in Participatory Mapping: A Case Study of PLUP+ in Labbo, Indonesia.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46918/eboni.v7i1.2651Keywords:
Perencanaan tata guna lahan, pemetaan partisipatif, hutan desa, Web-sig, stakholderAbstract
Participatory mapping faces the dual challenge of generating data that is both valid for formal institutions and accessible to local communities, particularly those living adjacent to forest areas. This study aims to develop a participatory mapping model that integrates geospatial technology with diverse stakeholder needs, identify factors influencing community participation, and evaluate implementation impacts on data validity. Through a qualitative approach and methodological engagement within a participatory action research framework in Labbo Village, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, we developed an Integrated Participatory Land Use Planning (PLUP+) model that combines Web-GIS with microclimate sensors. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews with key actors, focus group discussions, participatory observation, public consultations, and GPS measurements. Results indicate that appropriate technological integration significantly enhances data accuracy and community participation, particularly when aligned with immediate interests such as access to agricultural assistance programs and clarification of land/village boundaries. The model facilitates effective collaboration among stakeholders through a shared platform.Key supporting factors include adequate technological infrastructure and local political support, while unstable political dynamics and digital divides present significant barriers. PLUP+ successfully integrates local knowledge with geospatial technology,empowering communities in sustainable land use planning and natural resource management. This research contributes to bridging the gap between technological innovation and participatory approaches in resource governance, offering a scalable model for similar contexts globally.
References
Afnarius, S., Syukur, M., & Eka, G. E. (2020). Development of GIS for buildings in the customary village of Minangkabau Kota Gadang, West Sumatra, Indonesia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060365
Alesheikh, A. A., & Helali, H. (2020). Web GIS: Technologies and its applications. ISPRS IGU CIG Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and Applications.
Basiouka, S., & Potsiou, C. (2014). The volunteered geographic information in cadastre: Perspectives and citizens’ motivations over potential participation in mapping. GeoJournal, 79, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9497-7
Brown, G., & Kytta, M. (2018). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 95, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002
Carrero, R., Navas, F., & Malvarez, G. C. (2001). Artificial intelligence-based models to simulate land-use change around an estuary. Journal of Coastal Research, 70, 414–419. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI70-070.1
Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: Whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains? EJISDC, 25(2), 1–11.
Collins, S. L., Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Hagberg, A. et al. (2006). New opportunities in ecological sensing using wireless sensor networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(8), 402–407.
Cochrane, L., Corbett, J., Keller, P., & Canessa, R. (2014). Impact of community-based and participatory mapping. Institute for Studies and Innovation in Community-University Engagement, University of Victoria, Victoria.
Corbett, J., & Cochrane, L. (2017). Engaging with the participatory geoweb: Exploring the dynamics of VGI. In Campelo, C., Bertolotto, M., & Corcoran, P. (Eds.), Volunteered Geographic Information and the Future of Geospatial Data. Hershey: IGI Global.
Cochrane, L., & Corbett, J. (2018). Participatory mapping. In Servaes, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_6-1
Corbett, J., & Cochrane, L. (2020). Geospatial web, participatory. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10604-3
Colfer, P. C. J., & Resosudarmo, P. A. I. (2001). Which way forward: People, forests, and policymaking in Indonesia. ISBN: 1-891853-44-9.
Desai, V., & Potter, R. B. (2008). The companion to development studies. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-340-88914-5.
Dey, L. B., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Muhammad, S. S. (2020). Adoption, adaptation, use and impact of information systems during pandemic time and beyond: Research and managerial implications. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1820632
Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS – A people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081493
El-Mawla, A. N., Badawy, M., & Arafat, H. (2019). IoT for the failure of climate-change mitigation and adaptation and IIOT as a future solution. World Journal of Environmental Engineering, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.12692/wjee-6-1-2
Espinha, T., Zaidaman, A., & Gross, H. G. (2015). Web API growing pains: Loosely coupled yet strongly tied. Journal of Systems and Software, 100, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.014
Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2019). Web-based participatory mapping in informal settlements: The slums of Caracas, Venezuela. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102038
Fox, J., Suryanata, K., & Hershock, P. (2005). Mapping communities: Ethics, values, practice. Honolulu, HI: The East-West Center.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2020). Framework for integrated land use planning: An innovative approach. CB1170EN/1/11.20.
Feyisa, L. G., Palao, K. L., & Nelson, A. et al. (2020). Characterizing and mapping cropping patterns in a complex agro-ecosystem: An iterative participatory mapping procedure using machine learning algorithms and MODIS vegetation indices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 175, 105595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105595
Franch-Pardo, I., Napoletano, B. M., Rosete-Verges, F., & Billa, L. (2020). Spatial analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 739, 140033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140033
International Land Coalition. (2008). Participatory mapping as a tool for empowerment: Experiences and lessons learned from the ILC network.
Kim, Y. R. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on consumers: Preparing for digital sales. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.2990115
Kuemmerle, T., Erb, K., & Meyfroidt, P. et al. (2013). Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 484–493.
Laraswati, D., Krott, M., & Sahide, M. A. K. et al. (2021). Representation-Influence Framework (RIF) for analyzing the roles of organized interest groups (OIGs) in environmental governance. MethodsX, 8, 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101335
Liu, W., Dugar, S., McCallum, I. et al. (2018). Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7020068
Marlier, E. M., Defries, S. R., & Kim, S. P. et al. (2015). Fire emissions and regional air quality impacts from fires in oil palm, timber, and logging concessions in Indonesia. Environmental Research Letters, 10(8).
Marcer, J., Kelman, I., Suchet-Pearson, S., & Lloyd, K. (2009). Integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge bases for disaster risk reduction in Papua New Guinea. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91(2), 157–183.
Paneque-Galves, P., Vargas-Ramirez, N., Napoletano, B. M., & Commings, A. (2017). Grassroots innovation using drones for indigenous mapping and monitoring. Land, 6, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/land604008
Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406.
Perkins, C. (2008). Cultures of map use. Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 150–158.
Phillips, C., Caldas, A., Cleetus, R. et al. (2020). Compound climate risks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Climate Change, 10, 586–588.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal Eboni © 2019 by LPPM UMMA is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
9.png){kind=logo}
: Jl. DR. Samratulangi No.62 Maros 90511 Sulawesi Selatan
: https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/eboni/index
: 